....

May. 25th, 2006 08:00 am
hebbycakes: (Meanies)
[personal profile] hebbycakes


OTTAWA (CP) - Stephen Harper says journalists on Parliament Hill are biased against his government so he'll be avoiding them.


The prime minister says the parliamentary press gallery seems to have decided to become the opposition to his Conservative administration. He told a London, Ont., TV station on Wednesday that he is having problems with reporters in the capital that a Liberal prime minister would never face. So Harper says he will take his message out on the road and deal with the less hostile local media.


The comments were sparked by an incident Tuesday when two dozen Ottawa reporters walked out on a Harper event when he refused to take their questions.


The prime minister does not want to hold press conferences unless his staff choose which journalists ask questions from a list they compile. The Ottawa press gallery has refused to play by those rules.


Harper has groused publicly about an anti-Conservative bias in the media before - but not since becoming prime minister.


Ironically, senior Liberal officials earlier this year complained of an anti-Liberal bias in the national media.


In the dying days of the last election campaign, Paul Martin's staff grumbled that reporters were out to get them and were working to elect Harper.


One prominent media analyst said Wednesday the prime minister was being paranoid, and that his remarks were a strategic error that could backfire.


"Basically, what he's saying is the regional media can be trusted to be compliant. They will find that insulting," said Chris Dornan, head of Carleton University's journalism school.


"Just as the national press corps will find insulting the suggestion that they're all paid-up Liberal hacks.


"He's going out of his way to make enemies - and that's not a good sign."


The president of Ottawa's press gallery objected to Harper's comments.


"It's a little paranoid," said Yves Malo, a reporter with the Quebec-based TVA network, who urged his colleagues to walk out of the Tuesday news conference.


"I'm not anti-Conservative. I'm not pro-Conservative. I'm just a journalist who's trying to do his job."


Dornan said Harper's allegation is surprising because the Conservative government has generally received good coverage in the national media.


Harper earned mostly glowing headlines for the federal budget, for his new Accountability Act, for changes to the way Supreme Court justices are named, and for a cultural deal with Quebec.


But he also came under fire when he recruited David Emerson and the unelected Michael Fortier to cabinet. Harper has said he expected a negative reaction, but that it was worth it to build a stronger cabinet.

The government also received poor coverage when it announced journalists could no longer cover the repatriation ceremonies for soldiers killed in Afghanistan.

Even so, Harper's government is off to a good start with Canadian voters.

Recent polls have placed his Tories above 40 per cent, which could put them on track toward a majority government.

Relations with the media began deteriorating just weeks after the prime minister took office.

The relationship is so poor that his spokespeople have asked registered lobbyists to act as intermediaries in dealing with reporters.

Date: 2006-05-25 12:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyboy-fox.livejournal.com
The Conservatives are called 'Tories' in Canada too? I thought that was just a British thing :P

Ugh... in the UK, the Tories will probably be in power after the next election, 'cause our Labour PM is losing approval SO fast. Latest approval levels are scarily low. I really don't want to see the Conservatives in power... but... it'll probably happen. Whee. x.x

Date: 2006-05-25 03:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaiba-katt.livejournal.com
I don't want Conservatives in power at all. @___@ I mean, we'll all end up being like the US! ><

About the Tories thing.. Well, Canada was originally Britain's lil'baby. :3

Date: 2006-05-25 03:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyboy-fox.livejournal.com
The British PM is already pretty much G W Bush's little lapdog x.x

Date: 2006-05-25 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaiba-katt.livejournal.com
Yeah. Same with Harper. Or rather, he WANTS to be. =_= If he gets his majority government, then he WILL BE.

Date: 2006-05-25 03:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyboy-fox.livejournal.com
Doesn't look good, does it? x.x

Date: 2006-05-25 04:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaiba-katt.livejournal.com
Not at all. =____= GARGH! I WANT THE LIBERALS BACK, DARN IT!!

Date: 2006-05-25 04:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyboy-fox.livejournal.com
Labour is in power here, and they're more Liberal than the Tories... buuuut... I want to see the Liberal Democrats in power. I vote Lib Dem, because I don't like Labour and I REALLY don't like the Tories... but... the Lib Debs just aren't charismatic enough to get into power, and they have a reputation for being kinda wishywashy and 'flip-flopping'. Kinda like Kerry in the US elections x.x Great ideas, lousy campaign and character. Bleh.

Date: 2006-05-25 04:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaiba-katt.livejournal.com
I agree with you completely. I want our Lib Dems back... Not these 'pro-war' conservatives.

Date: 2006-05-25 04:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyboy-fox.livejournal.com
Heh, well it seems we both have pretty similar political views :) Nice. Doesn't change the fact that both our countries seem to be going to heck :P

Date: 2006-05-25 04:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaiba-katt.livejournal.com
Yeah, but I'm sure in time things will go back to the way they should be. *NODNOD*

Or rather, will go the way WE want them to.

November 2012

S M T W T F S
    123
45 6 78910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 06:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios